tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.comments2017-03-01T06:38:27.783-08:00Marine'sMarine Kelleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18062559620275999447noreply@blogger.comBlogger325125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-51593508164643595682014-06-19T14:27:25.062-07:002014-06-19T14:27:25.062-07:00I personally like the idea. It makes the whole sit...I personally like the idea. It makes the whole situation more realistic. But I do expect a lot of RLV users to disagree. There are a lot of jealous masters who would be annoyed that their slave girl is being used by some other man. To that, all I can say is that if you're bound and worried about being misused you shouldn't leave your house.Mike Hoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09079744279692869325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-54841434026673571972014-06-19T09:41:18.643-07:002014-06-19T09:41:18.643-07:00This is an interesting thought. Firstly, I agree ...This is an interesting thought. Firstly, I agree with your logic. Someone who is restrained and in public is inherently vulnerable, and someone who stumbles upon them can without a doubt do things to them. So I think it merits some thought as to what could be done. <br><br>Certainly I agree that clothing could be removed (cut away, torn off, etc.), but I'm not sure that it would be as easy, realistically, to add it.<br><br>Certainly other restraints could be added, so maybe the menu could give access to shared folders. Here too I think there should be a little realism; not many people wandering around in public have a ball gag and armbinder afterall (but if you know of anyone who does, please introduce me ;). So maybe there needs to be some limit on what can be selected from the RLV folders, perhaps restricting to easily carried items like handcuffs, tape, scarf, rope, maybe the ball and ring gags as well.<br><br><br />Certainly they could force the restrained person into positions, so having the ability to force sit on objects I think is ok, but additionally, maybe having a small AO with some selected force fantasy poses would make sense? I think the ability to add a leash is also ok.<br><br><br />All of this I think is good in the context that a restrained person encounters someone with less than pure intentions. However, I think we should probably also consider the case of the good Samaritan encounter. Perhaps the person you run into would prefer to help you get free? For tape and rope restraints, you already have his capability built in, but for locked restraints it may not be so easy. Leather straps and cuffs can be cut with heavy shears. Maybe the person has a set with them, or can find a pair nearby, or purchase a pair from a store? Padlocks can be defeated with bolt cutters. The likelihood of someone having a set is small, but they could easily acquire one. So I guess what I'm saying is there may be room in this idea for some additional accessory products to aid with more serious restraints. The only set I think would be rather impervious to manipulation is the Elegance set, since the hasps of the locks are internal in the design of the restraints.<br><br><br />Along the same idea as the good Samaritan, even if a restrained person encounters someone with less than pure intentions in public, it is unlikely that person will do anything while they can be seen by other people. So maybe there needs to be some logic that senses others who are nearby witnesses, and if there are any, then the options that are presented are restricted to things likes forcing the sub to follow you while you lead them someplace more private.<br><br><br />My own opinion on this idea is that it would enhance the realism of being restrained. One of the things I like most about physical restraint is the removal of free choice (yes, even though we all choose to be restrained in the first place and establish limits), and I think providing tools that enhance the aspect of vulnerability, helplessness and inability to stop something from happening are all good things in your product line.<br><br><br />-KelKelsie MacIntyrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-71737189293475778442014-06-19T09:36:03.273-07:002014-06-19T09:36:03.273-07:00Dear Marine,
first let me tell you that I LOVE you...Dear Marine,<br />first let me tell you that I LOVE your design and your way of making me helpless in your items.<br />But I too admit that there are times when I am not that playful and wear it just as a lovely accessory.<br />I would welcome the fact to become more vunerable, sometimes, but not always. I think I'd like to have the final decision how playful I am that day. for me it is a question of SSC. I experienced several morons out there, people I don't want to grant any access to my restraints.<br />In my opinion a switch to turn the 'playful mode' off would be nice, a feature that maybe should be granted only to the one who locked the restraints; so the owner decides what might happen to the bound one.<br />I am certain that some of my friends would simply love to be that helpless. Maybe I am more of a fun and not a serious player, I don't know, maybe I worry too much and most people just don't touch the restraints of others anyway.<br />One of your many fans<br />MargauxMargauxnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-45384040675476412912014-06-19T09:34:45.938-07:002014-06-19T09:34:45.938-07:00Dear Marine,
first let me tell you that I LOVE you...Dear Marine,<br />first let me tell you that I LOVE your design and your way of making me helpless in your items.<br />But I too admit that there are times when I am not that playful and wear it just as a lovely accessory.<br />I would welcome the fact to become more vunerable, sometimes, but not always. I think I'd like to have the final decision how playful I am that day. for me it is a question of SSC. I experienced several morons out there, people I don't want to grant any access to my restraints.<br />In my opinion a switch to turn the 'playful mode' off would be nice, a feature that maybe should be granted only to the one who locked the restraints; so the owner decides what might happen to the bound one.<br />I am certain that some of my friends would simply love to be that helpless. Maybe I am more of a fun and not a serious player, I don't know, maybe I worry too much and most people just don't touch the restraints of others anyway.<br />One of your many fans<br />MargauxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-47821725369101760812014-06-19T09:34:10.047-07:002014-06-19T09:34:10.047-07:00It's an interesting idea - and one that some w...It's an interesting idea - and one that some would welcome, but I have the following thoughts:<br /><br />1. although you say you don't want it to be an option - I actually believe it should be. Why? Because there are too many players who aren't adult in the true sense of that word - and who don't understand consensual play. In RL, a sub who goes out vulnerable does have some choices - and one is to choose when and where to be vulnerable.<br /><br />2. Leashing is an interesting option, but does not (unless I've missed something) allow struggling to get unleashed without struggling out of the restraint. This raises extra dangers that would only in RL attach if a kidnap is in progress. <br /><br />3. I like the ideas in general, but would prefer an option to make it optional.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-69134037721519463772014-06-19T09:02:25.658-07:002014-06-19T09:02:25.658-07:00It sounds like a very fun feature, but it definite...It sounds like a very fun feature, but it definitely needs to be a toggle as you'll find out if you start hanging in public places a little more, hehe. There's a world full of idiots out there. But if the toggle is under the control of the keyholder, then it's very close to the spirit of your idea!<br /><br />If it's possible, then perhaps the Sub should also get to choose if he wants the keyholder to control that toggle, just like the "Allow IM Restrictions" on the gags. Never hurts to give the paying customer more options, I think!<br /><br />An entirely different option, would be something like the puzzle on the restrains that don't have a key. It gives the Sub time to get away, and requires the person trying to gain control to not be a complete idiot. It's a decent compromise, though it probably doesn't feel very realistic for this purpose of just grabbing the sub to make them sit, strip, etc.Julian Sladehttps://my.secondlife.com/julian.sladenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-89320518970465484422014-06-19T08:56:22.729-07:002014-06-19T08:56:22.729-07:00(From Chorazin Allen, again) Another quick comment...(From Chorazin Allen, again) Another quick comment on the proposal itself - I don't think the new behaviour should be enabled when just locked (ie not in a pose). The reality check here is that mobility is normal if the arms are not linked by chains/straps/ropes.<br /><br />--ChorazinAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-22916881856973228452014-06-19T08:47:15.454-07:002014-06-19T08:47:15.454-07:00(From Chorazin Allen) See my Public Plugin https(i...(From Chorazin Allen) See my Public Plugin https(insert characters)marketplace.secondlife.com/p/CoC-RR-Public-Plugin-Copy/2449894 .. this provides a Public mode with leash plugin access without handing over the key to the public user. It sounds pretty similar in concept to this.<br /><br />Access to the main menu and other plugins is prevented to ensure that the wearer can't be unlocked by the public user and has to wait until they encounter their keyholder again or a timer fires.<br /><br />Being a third party plugin, the wearer can choose whether to have it present or not (and active or not).<br /><br />So, overall it's a good idea, and mostly already available other than the sit & outfit extensions which could probably be added easily into the plugin using the same techniques I use to present the leash plugin without permitting main menu access.<br /><br />--Chorazin<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-60881527336218440632014-06-19T08:43:25.268-07:002014-06-19T08:43:25.268-07:00I would speculate that many Doms don't like an...I would speculate that many Doms don't like anyone else playing with their subs. If you don't make the new behavior optional via a config menu, Doms might prohibit further use of your toys.<br /><br />Perhaps it could be configurable if a third party locks a restraint, but mandatory if the restraint is self-locked?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-23681376409550397072014-06-19T08:41:52.325-07:002014-06-19T08:41:52.325-07:00I like the idea, but feel it should be an option s...I like the idea, but feel it should be an option someplace. Not every one is the same. Some subs may not want to be that exposed, but many would. I don't think one size fits all, im my humble opinion. I am viewing this from the Dom/me side. <br />-HeatherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-90434008028606091402014-06-19T08:34:03.250-07:002014-06-19T08:34:03.250-07:00This would be a good idea ONLY if folk in SL actua...This would be a good idea ONLY if folk in SL actually respected common-sense rules about role-play. The simple fact is that there is a small but irritating minority that don't and would make life really difficult for the restrained and their nominal captors or for a D/s pair. Nice idea Marine, but not practicable.Ayeshanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-54015977031305212882010-08-28T07:34:05.482-07:002010-08-28T07:34:05.482-07:00Actually Emerald implements the RLV API in its own...Actually Emerald implements the RLV API in its own way, so the viewer I publish doesn't work with it.Marine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-57219558569483539012010-08-25T15:35:01.919-07:002010-08-25T15:35:01.919-07:00Hi,SL name is Bimbyken Beresford. Can you tell me ...Hi,SL name is Bimbyken Beresford. Can you tell me how this fits in with the Emerald viewer? Thanks, Ken.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04517428483771767785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-47276488004057548062010-06-30T09:55:29.112-07:002010-06-30T09:55:29.112-07:00You can do that, if you feel like cheating. To me ...You can do that, if you feel like cheating. To me logging on with a non-RLV to detach restraints is either cheating or safewording (unless something is seriously broken with the viewer). And nobody wants to play with a cheater.<br /><br />And if you want to insult me, do so in-world. I don't argue with anonymous people.Marine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-54659506471729184472010-06-30T07:32:51.529-07:002010-06-30T07:32:51.529-07:00So how can it really be a restraint? I could just ...So how can it really be a restraint? I could just log on with the normal viewer and escape...? Its really the same as just saying you won't take these things off. It's RP. If you need the viewer, it's because you and your partner suck at RP?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-62543476268991424892010-04-04T02:50:50.847-07:002010-04-04T02:50:50.847-07:00No that is completely untrue. The RLV does not bre...No that is completely untrue. The RLV does not breach privacy, I'm very careful about that.Marine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-24061757081528752502010-04-04T02:21:52.850-07:002010-04-04T02:21:52.850-07:00i heard that people who use this, their partners c...i heard that people who use this, their partners can hack in to thier subs computer is that true?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-45433459466917505952010-01-25T20:09:39.653-08:002010-01-25T20:09:39.653-08:00*read*readAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-48278937164634762922010-01-25T20:08:37.453-08:002010-01-25T20:08:37.453-08:00Today i came across the RLV and i am researcing it...Today i came across the RLV and i am researcing it to see if i want to use it..<br />i was wondering if the RLV allows the Domme to ready my local chat, IM's, inventory ectAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-74299351543491634302010-01-06T06:04:37.029-08:002010-01-06T06:04:37.029-08:00Hi,
My master & myself have got a blogger abo...Hi,<br /><br />My master & myself have got a blogger about bdsm too, and we use RLV so thank you so much for this viewer, we love it !<br />Would you like to become a member of our blogger ?<br />We are on yours.<br />Best regards,<br />CallyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-12356517354081427772009-10-08T14:41:01.715-07:002009-10-08T14:41:01.715-07:00Ok guys, I have coded these commands (addatach, re...Ok guys, I have coded these commands (addatach, remattach, with or without parameters, plus the synonym). They are still to be tested thoroughly, and I would like to add a couple more unrelated commands and a bugfix in the next version 1.22.<br /><br />Can't give an ETA yet because RL is very busy here, but I'm glad we settled for an easy and versatile solution already, in fact it even makes the code clearer now.<br /><br />Thanks again, I will now close the comments since the problem is now solved.<br /><br />Have fun !<br />MarineMarine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-81306909218127213372009-10-08T08:54:00.237-07:002009-10-08T08:54:00.237-07:00@addattach and @remattach work too, it's just ...@addattach and @remattach work too, it's just a matter of giving a name to the commands... And as I was planning to create a @detachpoint:point=force as a synonym to @detach:point=force, well I guess that would become a @remattach:point=force, no problem :)Marine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-75159063520279226892009-10-08T08:29:43.913-07:002009-10-08T08:29:43.913-07:00Thanks Marine,
I am definitely one of the ones wh...Thanks Marine,<br /><br />I am definitely one of the ones who wants to see the split. The names of the commands are not hugely relevant to me, I will change my use of @detach:xxx=n to use any new name. I prefer short names but @detachpoint is no big deal.<br /><br />As I see it, the problem for both the viewer and the scripter comes if both @attachpoint and @detachpoint are set to =n for the same point. I'll make sure I don't do that, in which case life is good!Chloe Constantinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15201357687244898961noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-35305857602079927382009-10-08T08:26:13.554-07:002009-10-08T08:26:13.554-07:00Another small detail: @attachpoint/@detachpoint is...Another small detail: @attachpoint/@detachpoint is not really consistant with the current command set.<br />What about @addattach/@remattach?(symmetrical to @addoutfit/@remoutfit)<br /><br />@remattach:attachpt=force could also become a synonym to @detach:attachpt=force, thus completing the symmetry (and removing the ambiguity with folder commands).Satomi Ahnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06719634474523367101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5995014436778770814.post-63112752290590165112009-10-08T05:23:20.193-07:002009-10-08T05:23:20.193-07:00That's not impossible, in which case @getattac...That's not impossible, in which case @getattach would have to be deprecated, and its successor (for instance getlockedattach) would have to be resistant to such a change. But I repeat, LL has not given any hint that they were going to move in that direction. It is just a strong wish of many Residents (including me) to add more attach points. And that's a viewer only change. Problem is, everyone must use a viewer that implements this change exactly the same way or the avatars would not look good.Marine Kelleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17575963708722461520noreply@blogger.com